Thursday, July 29th, 2004
More on the homegroup
![]() |
When it comes to the interpretation of scripture I owe a debt of thanks to the Methodist movement for coining the term “Wesleyan Quadrilateral”. To borrow a very American metaphor, we can think of the interpretation of scripture as being like the 4 bases of a baseball diamond.
We start and end with scripture. It’s God’s word and His primary method by which He speaks to us today, the measure by which we measure other forms of communication and totally authoritative on matters of faith and practice. We must remember the simple principle that scripture interprets scripture, for example the book of Revelation contains upwards of 200 references to Old Testament passages.
First base is tradition. We have 19 centuries of believers behind us, and we’re not the first people to read a given passage of the bible. Obviously we must let the scriptures speak for themselves, but we can look down the years and see what the vast majority of other believers saw in the passage also. The appeal to tradition allows the weight of orthodoxy to bear down on us, for sure, but that cannot be a bad thing when all is said and done.
Second base is experience. Jesus promised that He would send the Holy Spirit, the 3rd member of the trinity, to lead us into all truth. As we walk through life we will experience His presence and hear His voice speaking. We must measure our experiences in the light of tradition and scripture, but we can also let our experiences speak when interpreting what the bible has to say. For example, I picked up a liking for the theory of quantum mechanics as I have gone through the various levels of schooling. According to quantum theory, a photon of light is both a wave and a particle at the same time and the kind of observation you make of the photon of light will determine how we see it. In light of this experience I have learned that it is perfectly possible, and often mandatory, to hold 2 seemingly contradictory truths in mind at once. It was Niels Bohr that said “The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.” This experience of science affords me the mental tools to be able to hold 2 profound truths in tension - free will and predestination.
Third base is reason. We know that God created the universe we see, imparting order and structure to His creation; the world around us is a pale reflection of the order and perfection of the God that created ex nihilo. God gave us the power to think and reflect, so we should never be afraid to engage our brain when it comes to reading and interpreting scripture. God says in Isaiah 1:18, “Come now, let us reason together. Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool.” So, as we approach scripture we should apply logic and avoid category mistakes (applying a concept outside the domain in which it can meaningfully be applied - like asking what the colour blue tastes like), and offering illogical impossibilities (can God create a rock so heavy He cant lift it?).
Finally we return to scripture. We must ask, what do these other tools tell us that God is saying through a particular passage, and once we understand it in its context, what does that say to us today. Beware that as we hear the word of God, we should also try to put it into action too.


